One might suggest that in the
year 2011, at the peak of success, the British film industry is under public
scrutiny and may be adversely affected by the global economic decline
controversy.
“Government
cuts will damage our ability
to tell the world about our national culture,” is but one argument against the
global economic decline leading towards cutbacks in the British film industry.
Are the government cuts
justified?
In other words, can old bridges
constructed throughout the course of history and funded accordingly, still hold
sway in a changing economic climate? Are new bridges in order?
Look at the recent awards for “The King’s Speech”.
“The King's Speech was
nominated in 14 categories and won in seven, including best film and best
British film.”
“The King's Speech triumphed
with seven Baftas, leaving little glory for anyone else.”
Perhaps part of the global
economic controversy affecting the film industry everywhere, has more to do
with the availability of funding for specific film industry projects,
particularly those that are ethnocentric in nature, than anything else.
British monarchists argue in
favor of funding in the film industry oriented to promoting the monarchy of the
United Kingdom
(the British monarchy), which should surprise no one. Other countries do the
same thing, at the same time promoting their own social mores and current
values.
The question becomes one of
what happens in the film industry, when an ethnocentric approach appears to be
outmoded as obsolete. There are those who will argue that the British monarchy
is not obsolete, in fact it is more pertinent in this day and age, than ever.
Perhaps it may never become outmoded. A recent visit to Canada and the United States , by representatives
of the British monarchy, may have made that increasingly evident.
Relevancy of the monarchy
appears to be the key, but does the film making industry make the monarchy
relevant or does the monarchy make the film industry relevant?
While all efforts in the
British film industry are to be highly commended for their success, a pro or
anti-monarchy dispute may be at the heart of the British film industry. At some
point in time, the public may begin to demand a change in the film
industry.
Perhaps a re-focusing of the
British film industry in terms of more pertinent family values is timely,
because of the transitions in the monarchy. Regardless, there will be
changes, as that is inevitable.
Will the anti-monarchists ever
be able to obtain glory in the British film industry? If so, will it be secure?
Will the monarchists ultimately hold sway?
Can old bridges stand forever?
No comments:
Post a Comment